While Israel’s National Security Council has warned its citizens against all non-essential travel to South Africa – implementing a level-three threat level – the inbound tourism industry has issued assurances that South Africa remains a peaceful travel destination for Israeli and Jewish travellers.

Inbound industry association, SATSA, issued a messaging statement for its members and the industry at large, if queried about the safety of Israeli travellers.

The statement highlighted: “We understand travellers may be concerned about potential unrest due to these political issues. Political debates like these don't lead to hostility or violence within our borders. Our commitment to providing a safe and enriching experience for visitors remains unchanged.

“South Africa continues to value dialogue and peaceful exchange.”

SATSA’s messaging around the International Court of Justice case – The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip – that the South African government is involved in, emphasised that this reflected their perspective on the Israel-Palestine conflict, especially events in Gaza.

SATSA pointed out that it was important to recognise that opinions in South Africa were diverse on this issue. While the government's position is clear, it doesn't represent the views of all South Africans.

“Many people here have different viewpoints – some argue for a more balanced approach to Israel and Palestine, while others question whether the government's current approach is effective.”

SATSA continued: “Even with the government's stance, ties between South Africans and Israelis are still robust and diverse, including cultural, social and economic links. There is ongoing open engagement with Israeli society, which includes welcoming Israeli and Jewish visitors to South Africa. Our country is proud of its diversity and hospitality, and we assure all international tourists, including Israelis, that they are welcome here.”

The court case – implications for South Africa

The world is watching for the provisional International Court of Justice ruling on the case brought against Israel by the South African government. Insiders say the ruling seeking an injunction to immediately halt the hostilities could be made within weeks.

“Should an injunction be granted, it would help create conditions conducive to peace talks, allowing the exchange of hostages and permitting humanitarian aid, like food, water, and medicines, to enter the war zone,” said Oscar van Heerden, a senior research fellow for African diplomacy and leadership at the University of Johannesburg in an op-ed piece for News24.

He added: “The actual determination on whether this is a genocide will still have to follow extensive investigations, collection of evidence, summoning numerous individuals, and much much more.”

This investigation and subsequent ICJ ruling could, therefore, take years.

Many countries have supported South Africa’s ICJ case, while others, including many key source tourism markets, have vehemently opposed it. This has sparked concern about the implications for South Africa’s relationships abroad.

Van Heerden has also warned of the potential global consequences, noting that regardless of the outcome of the court case, South Africa will be targeted for the stand it has taken against Israel.

“A low-intensity plan may unfold to destabilise South Africa's economy, followed by all manner of diplomatic restraints which will undoubtedly target our diplomats in certain countries in the north. Bilateral agreements will also come under the spotlight,” he wrote.